Your raw score is converted to a scale of 250 to 750, and 600 or higher passes. A pass report shows only that you passed; a fail report gives your score and the areas to improve.
Questions
100, multiple choice
Time
120 minutes (2 hours)
Where
Pearson VUE test centers
Passing score
600 on a 250 to 750 scale
How scoring works
Raw scores are converted to a scaled score from 250 to 750.
600 or higher is a pass.
A pass report shows only that you passed, with no number.
A fail report shows your numeric score and the syllabus areas where you need to improve.
If you do not pass
You can retake a part 30 days after your most recent attempt.
The handbook allows at most eight attempts at each part.
All three parts must be passed within three years of acceptance into the program.
What 600 means for your preparation
The scaled score is not a percentage, and no percentage of questions right is published as the pass line. The practical aim is to be comfortably strong in every section, because a weak section costs marks that the others must make up.
Try 4 questions
Question 1Financial, human and technology resources of the function
A newly appointed chief audit executive drafts a budget that covers staff salaries and benefits only. Which addition would most improve its completeness?
Question 2Sources of potential engagements
A bank's audit universe has 280 units, but the internal audit function has the resources for about 45 engagements a year. A board member suggests cutting the universe down to the units that can be audited. What is the best response?
Question 3The quality assurance and improvement program: internal and external assessments
Once a year, a senior auditor at a university who did not work on the engagements selects a sample of completed engagements and checks them against the methodology and the Standards, reporting the results to the chief audit executive. This activity is best described as:
Question 4Closing communications and the final engagement report
A week after issuing a report on a university's research equipment, the team realizes that a significant finding on missing high-value items was left out of the final version by mistake. How should this be handled?