Paper A style · Utility · Straightforward · 8 marks
Three employees of Harrowgate Asset Management make the following claims about shares listed on the London Stock Exchange.
Claim 1 (a technical analyst): "By studying charts of past share prices and trading volumes I can identify patterns that earn returns above those justified by risk."
Claim 2 (a fundamental analyst): "By reading company results and broker reports the moment they are published, I can pick shares that beat the market after allowing for risk."
Claim 3 (a director): "Because I sit on the board of a company in takeover talks that have not yet been announced, I could make abnormal profits by trading its shares."
(i)
Describe the weak, semi-strong and strong forms of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis.
3 marks
(ii)
For each claim, state the weakest form of the hypothesis which, if it held, would mean the claim is false. Give a brief reason in each case.
3 marks
(iii)
Explain one consequence for an investment manager if the semi-strong form holds.
2 marks
Properties of power utility
Paper A style · Utility · Straightforward · 8 marks
An investor's utility of wealth w>0 is U(w)=1−γw1−γ, where γ>0 and γ=1.
(i)
Show that the investor is non-satiated and risk averse.
2 marks
(ii)
Show that the coefficient of absolute risk aversion is γ/w and the coefficient of relative risk aversion is γ. Describe what each result means for the investor's behaviour as wealth increases.
3 marks
(iii)
For γ=2.5 and current wealth £50,000, the investor is offered a gamble that adds or subtracts £5,000 with equal probability. Using the approximation that the risk premium is about 21A(w)σ2, where σ2 is the variance of the gamble, estimate the risk premium to the nearest £1.
2 marks
(iv)
State the utility function obtained in the limit as γ→1 (after subtracting the constant 1/(1−γ)).
1 mark
Certainty equivalent with square-root utility
Paper A style · Utility · Straightforward · 6 marks
An investor has utility of wealth U(w)=w, where w is in £000. She holds an investment that will leave her with wealth of either £196,000 or £64,000 in one year's time, each with probability 0.5.
(i)
Show that the investor is non-satiated and risk averse.
2 marks
(ii)
Calculate the certainty equivalent of the investment, to the nearest £1.
2 marks
(iii)
Calculate the risk premium the investor attaches to the investment, to the nearest £1.
1 mark
(iv)
Someone offers to buy the investment from her now in exchange for a guaranteed £125,000 in one year's time. Should she accept? Explain your answer.
1 mark
Abnormal returns after a profit warning
Paper A style · Utility · Standard · 9 marks
Kestrel Retail plc issued an unexpected profit warning before the market opened on day 0. A researcher models the share's expected daily return by the market model, with expected return 0.0002+1.2Rm on a day when the market return is Rm. The observed daily returns were:
Day 0: share −6.10%, market −0.40%
Day 1: share −1.25%, market 0.30%
Day 2: share −0.90%, market −0.15%
Day 3: share −0.60%, market 0.10%
The abnormal return on a day is the observed return less the expected return.
(i)
Calculate the abnormal return on day 0, as a percentage to 2 decimal places.
2 marks
(ii)
Calculate the cumulative abnormal return over days 1 to 3, as a percentage to 2 decimal places.
3 marks
(iii)
Suppose that a study of many profit warnings finds similar negative abnormal returns persisting for several days after the announcement. Comment on what this suggests about the semi-strong form of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis.
2 marks
(iv)
Explain the joint hypothesis problem in testing market efficiency.
2 marks
Risk aversion under quadratic utility
Paper A style · Utility · Standard · 8 marks
An investor's utility of wealth w (in £000) is U(w)=w−0.004w2.
(i)
Determine the largest level of wealth (in £000) up to which the investor is non-satiated.
2 marks
(ii)
Calculate the investor's coefficient of absolute risk aversion when wealth is £50,000, to 5 decimal places (in units of per £000).
2 marks
(iii)
Show that both absolute risk aversion A(w) and relative risk aversion R(w) increase with wealth over the range found in part (i).
2 marks
(iv)
Explain why increasing absolute risk aversion is considered an unrealistic property, and state one other drawback of quadratic utility.
2 marks
Log utility and the size of wealth
Paper A style · Utility · Standard · 8 marks
An investor has utility of wealth U(w)=lnw. She may choose one of two investments, each lasting one year:
Investment X increases her wealth by £8,000 with probability 0.4 and reduces it by £4,000 with probability 0.6.
Investment Y increases her wealth by £500 with certainty.
Ignore interest and expenses.
(i)
Her current wealth is £20,000. Calculate the certainty equivalent of her wealth if she chooses Investment X, to the nearest £1, and state which investment she prefers.
3 marks
(ii)
Repeat part (i) for an investor with the same utility function whose current wealth is £200,000. Give the certainty equivalent gain from Investment X (the certainty equivalent wealth minus £200,000), to the nearest £1, and state which investment this investor prefers.
3 marks
(iii)
Explain the difference between your answers to parts (i) and (ii) in terms of the investor's absolute risk aversion.
2 marks
Exponential utility and the equity allocation
Paper A style · Utility · Standard · 10 marks
An investor with wealth £400,000 has utility of wealth U(w)=−e−aw with a=2×10−5 per £. She will invest £x in an equity fund whose one-year return is normally distributed with mean 7% and standard deviation 18%, and the rest in a deposit account paying 3% a year with certainty. There are no expenses or taxes.
(i)
Show that if wealth at the end of the year is W∼N(m,s2), then E[U(W)]=−exp(−am+21a2s2), and hence that the investor ranks choices by m−21as2.
3 marks
(ii)
Calculate the amount x that maximises her expected utility, to the nearest £1.
3 marks
(iii)
Calculate the certainty equivalent of her end-year wealth when she invests the amount found in part (ii), and hence the amount by which it exceeds the £412,000 she would have by holding only the deposit, to the nearest £1.
2 marks
(iv)
State how the optimal amount in equities would change if her wealth were £800,000, and comment on whether this is realistic.
2 marks
Maximum and minimum premiums for cover
Paper A style · Utility · Standard · 8 marks
A self-employed van driver has total wealth of £60,000, which includes his van. Over the next year there is a probability of 0.08 that the van is written off, causing a loss of £15,000, and otherwise there is no loss. His utility of wealth is U(w)=lnw.
An insurer whose utility of wealth is UI(w)=−e−0.00001w is willing to provide full cover against this loss. Ignore interest and expenses.
(i)
Calculate the maximum premium the driver would pay for full cover, to the nearest £1.
3 marks
(ii)
Calculate the minimum premium the insurer would accept for providing the cover, to the nearest £1.
3 marks
(iii)
Comment on your answers.
2 marks
Quadratic utility and two portfolios
Paper A style · Utility · Standard · 10 marks
An investor's utility of wealth w (in £000) is U(w)=w−0.01w2. She must choose one of two portfolios. Her wealth in one year's time will have mean £30,000 and standard deviation £6,000 under Portfolio A, and mean £32,000 and standard deviation £10,000 under Portfolio B.
(i)
Show that for quadratic utility the expected utility of wealth W depends only on the mean and variance of W.
2 marks
(ii)
Calculate the expected utility of each portfolio and state which she prefers. Give the expected utility of Portfolio B as your numerical answer, to 2 decimal places.
3 marks
(iii)
Keeping the mean of Portfolio B at £32,000, calculate the standard deviation of Portfolio B (in £, to the nearest £10) that would make her indifferent between the two portfolios.
3 marks
(iv)
Comment on a weakness of using this utility function to compare these portfolios.
2 marks
Choosing an excess with exponential utility
Paper A style · Utility · Hard · 13 marks
A small business faces a property loss X over the next year. With probability 0.8 there is no loss; with probability 0.2 a loss occurs whose size is uniformly distributed between £0 and £10,000. The owner's utility of wealth is U(w)=−e−0.0002w. An insurer offers two policies, each priced at 130% of the expected claim payment:
Policy F pays the whole loss.
Policy E pays the loss in excess of £2,000 (the business pays the first £2,000 of any loss).
The owner may also buy no cover. Ignore interest and expenses.
(i)
Calculate the premium for Policy E, to the nearest £1. (You should also find that the premium for Policy F is £1,300.)
2 marks
(ii)
Let C be the total cost to the business over the year (premium plus any part of the loss it bears). Show that the owner prefers the option with the smallest value of c=0.00021lnE[e0.0002C], whatever the owner's initial wealth.
2 marks
(iii)
Calculate c if the owner buys no cover, to the nearest £1.
3 marks
(iv)
Calculate c if the owner buys Policy E, to the nearest £1.
4 marks
(v)
Recommend which option the owner should choose and comment on the result.
2 marks
State-dependent utility and optimal cover
Paper A style · Utility · Hard · 10 marks
A collector has wealth of £100,000, which includes a painting worth £40,000. Over the next year there is a probability of 0.1 that the painting is stolen. She can buy cover of any amount £C (with 0≤C≤40,000) at a premium of £0.10 per £1 of cover, paid at the start of the year; if the painting is stolen the insurer pays £C. Work in units of £000 and ignore interest.
Her utility of wealth w (in £000) is lnw if the painting is not stolen and klnw if it is stolen, where k is a positive constant.
(i)
Show that her expected utility is maximised when C satisfies 60+0.9C=k(100−0.1C), and deduce that with k=1 she buys full cover.
4 marks
(ii)
Calculate the optimal amount of cover when k=0.8, to the nearest £1.
3 marks
(iii)
Explain why she chooses less than full cover when k=0.8, even though the premium is actuarially fair, and give one realistic example of a situation where utility may depend on the state of the world.
3 marks
Power utility with lognormal fund returns
Paper A style · Utility · Hard · 11 marks
An investor with utility of wealth U(w)=1−γw1−γ (with γ>0,γ=1) will invest all of her current wealth w0 for one year in one of two funds. If X is the accumulation factor of the chosen fund over the year (so her wealth becomes w0X), then lnX∼N(0.05,0.102) for Fund A and lnX∼N(0.085,0.202) for Fund B.
(i)
Show that if lnX∼N(μ,σ2), the certainty equivalent of her end-year wealth is w0exp(μ+21(1−γ)σ2).
3 marks
(ii)
For γ=3, calculate the certainty equivalent rate of return of each fund (that is, c/w0−1) and state which fund she prefers. Give the value for Fund B as your numerical answer, as a percentage to 2 decimal places.
3 marks
(iii)
Calculate the value of γ at which she would be indifferent between the two funds, to 4 decimal places.
3 marks
(iv)
Explain why her choice of fund does not depend on her current wealth w0, and why this is consistent with the relative risk aversion of her utility function.
2 marks
Choosing a fund under three utility functions
Paper B style · Utility · Standard · 20 marks
An investor has £100,000 to invest for one year in exactly one of three funds, A, B and C. An economic scenario generator has produced 30 equally likely scenarios; the table gives each fund's one-year return in each scenario (0.0523 means 5.23%). Work in units of £000, so end-year wealth in a scenario is 100(1+r). Ignore expenses and taxes.
For the power utility function use U(w)=1−γw1−γ for γ=1, and U(w)=lnw when γ=1. The certainty equivalent c of a fund satisfies U(c)=E[U(W)].
ut-p13.csv: 30 rows, 4 columns
Show the data
Scenario
FundA
FundB
FundC
1
0.006
0.1142
-0.0281
2
0.0529
0.0909
0.2208
3
0.1116
0.1342
0.3999
4
0.0752
0.1788
0.2063
5
0.0549
0.1887
-0.1477
6
0.0995
-0.0266
-0.0475
7
0.0691
0.0364
0.6256
8
0.1232
0.1598
-0.4843
9
-0.0135
0.0859
0.4626
10
0.045
0.0676
-0.5285
11
0.0618
0.1848
-0.1986
12
0.013
0.0598
0.3273
13
0.0408
0.146
0.0087
14
-0.0023
-0.0683
-0.1597
15
-0.0139
0.2773
0.3412
16
0.0888
-0.0011
0.3813
17
-0.056
0.0278
-0.1008
18
-0.0223
0.362
0.1764
19
0.0234
0.2426
0.6778
20
-0.0002
0.1287
0.0925
21
0.0788
0.0225
0.1977
22
0.0659
0.0151
0.1762
23
0.0507
-0.1206
0.1942
24
0.1019
-0.0158
0.1687
25
0.0871
-0.2556
-0.018
26
0.086
0.1177
0.212
27
0.0552
0.0887
-0.1929
28
0.0414
-0.0579
0.02
29
0.0751
0.0793
-0.0754
30
0.0791
-0.1255
0.0746
(i)
A risk-neutral investor would choose the fund with the highest expected end-year wealth. Calculate the expected end-year wealth of each fund. State which fund the risk-neutral investor chooses, and give its expected end-year wealth (in £000, to 3 decimal places).
3 marks
(ii)
For an investor with U(w)=lnw, calculate the certainty equivalent of each fund. State which fund this investor chooses and give its certainty equivalent (in £000, to 3 decimal places).
4 marks
(iii)
Repeat part (ii) for power utility with γ=5. Give the certainty equivalent of the chosen fund (in £000, to 3 decimal places).
4 marks
(iv)
Use Goal Seek (or otherwise) to find the value of γ, greater than 1, at which the investor is indifferent between Funds A and B. Give γ to 2 decimal places.