Level II

How hard is Level II?

Level II asks more of each question than Level I. Every question hangs off a vignette, so you must find the right figures in a page of text and exhibits, then apply a valuation or accounting method to them. Over the last ten years 45% of Level II candidates passed, against 40% at Level I.

Questions88, in 22 item sets of 4
TimeTwo sessions of 2 hours 12 minutes
Penalty for a wrong answerNone
2027 windowsMay, August and November
10-year average pass rate45% (2017 to 2026)

What makes it hard

  • Vignettes: CFA Institute says Level II questions must be answered from the vignette and are not free-standing. You read a case, then answer four questions on it.
  • Depth: equity valuation, fixed income trees and credit, intercorporate accounting, pensions and currency translation all need multi-step calculation.
  • Pace: 22 item sets in 264 minutes is 12 minutes a set, about 3 minutes a question, including the reading.
  • Breadth: ten topics, five of them weighted 10 to 15%: Financial Statement Analysis, Equities, Fixed Income, Portfolio Construction and Ethics.

What makes it easier

Each set sits in one topic, so a set you know well is quick marks. Read the four questions before the vignette, so you know which figures to hunt for. There is no penalty for a wrong answer, so every question gets an answer.

How Level II compares with Level I

Level ILevel II
QuestionsStand-alone88 in 22 vignette item sets
10-year average pass rate (2017 to 2026)40%45%

Try 4 questions

Question 1Term structure and rate dynamics
Item set: Corvane Asset Management: spot and forward rates

Lena Okafor, CFA, manages a government bond portfolio at Corvane Asset Management. She is preparing a briefing for a junior analyst, Theo Brandt, on how the par curve, the spot curve and the forward curve relate, and how the firm uses them to value bonds and to frame expected returns.

Okafor starts from the par yields on annual-coupon government bonds shown in Exhibit 1. She tells Brandt that each par yield is the coupon rate at which a bond of that maturity would price at exactly 100, and that the spot rates used to discount single cash flows must be extracted from these par yields one maturity at a time. All rates are annual rates with annual compounding.

Exhibit 1. Government par yields (annual coupons, annual compounding)

1-year: 2.50%

2-year: 3.00%

3-year: 3.40%

4-year: 3.70%

Brandt is also asked to value a 3-year government bond with a 5% annual coupon, paid at the end of each year, using the spot rates he derives. Okafor adds that a two-year forward rate starting two years from now is often quoted on the desk when the team discusses where medium-term rates are priced to be in the future.

Finally, Okafor asks Brandt to think about returns. She says: "Suppose that over the next year, interest rates evolve exactly as the current forward rates imply. I want you to tell me what one-year holding period return we would earn on the 3-year 5% bond under that scenario, and how it compares with the bond's yield to maturity." Brandt notes that the bond's yield to maturity, computed from the price he derives, is 3.39%.

The 3-year spot rate is closest to:
Question 2Term structure and rate dynamics
Item set: Corvane Asset Management: spot and forward rates

Lena Okafor, CFA, manages a government bond portfolio at Corvane Asset Management. She is preparing a briefing for a junior analyst, Theo Brandt, on how the par curve, the spot curve and the forward curve relate, and how the firm uses them to value bonds and to frame expected returns.

Okafor starts from the par yields on annual-coupon government bonds shown in Exhibit 1. She tells Brandt that each par yield is the coupon rate at which a bond of that maturity would price at exactly 100, and that the spot rates used to discount single cash flows must be extracted from these par yields one maturity at a time. All rates are annual rates with annual compounding.

Exhibit 1. Government par yields (annual coupons, annual compounding)

1-year: 2.50%

2-year: 3.00%

3-year: 3.40%

4-year: 3.70%

Brandt is also asked to value a 3-year government bond with a 5% annual coupon, paid at the end of each year, using the spot rates he derives. Okafor adds that a two-year forward rate starting two years from now is often quoted on the desk when the team discusses where medium-term rates are priced to be in the future.

Finally, Okafor asks Brandt to think about returns. She says: "Suppose that over the next year, interest rates evolve exactly as the current forward rates imply. I want you to tell me what one-year holding period return we would earn on the 3-year 5% bond under that scenario, and how it compares with the bond's yield to maturity." Brandt notes that the bond's yield to maturity, computed from the price he derives, is 3.39%.

The two-year forward rate two years from now, stated as an annual rate, is closest to:
Question 3Term structure and rate dynamics
Item set: Corvane Asset Management: spot and forward rates

Lena Okafor, CFA, manages a government bond portfolio at Corvane Asset Management. She is preparing a briefing for a junior analyst, Theo Brandt, on how the par curve, the spot curve and the forward curve relate, and how the firm uses them to value bonds and to frame expected returns.

Okafor starts from the par yields on annual-coupon government bonds shown in Exhibit 1. She tells Brandt that each par yield is the coupon rate at which a bond of that maturity would price at exactly 100, and that the spot rates used to discount single cash flows must be extracted from these par yields one maturity at a time. All rates are annual rates with annual compounding.

Exhibit 1. Government par yields (annual coupons, annual compounding)

1-year: 2.50%

2-year: 3.00%

3-year: 3.40%

4-year: 3.70%

Brandt is also asked to value a 3-year government bond with a 5% annual coupon, paid at the end of each year, using the spot rates he derives. Okafor adds that a two-year forward rate starting two years from now is often quoted on the desk when the team discusses where medium-term rates are priced to be in the future.

Finally, Okafor asks Brandt to think about returns. She says: "Suppose that over the next year, interest rates evolve exactly as the current forward rates imply. I want you to tell me what one-year holding period return we would earn on the 3-year 5% bond under that scenario, and how it compares with the bond's yield to maturity." Brandt notes that the bond's yield to maturity, computed from the price he derives, is 3.39%.

Using the spot rates, the value of the 3-year 5% bond per 100 of par is closest to:
Question 4Term structure and rate dynamics
Item set: Corvane Asset Management: spot and forward rates

Lena Okafor, CFA, manages a government bond portfolio at Corvane Asset Management. She is preparing a briefing for a junior analyst, Theo Brandt, on how the par curve, the spot curve and the forward curve relate, and how the firm uses them to value bonds and to frame expected returns.

Okafor starts from the par yields on annual-coupon government bonds shown in Exhibit 1. She tells Brandt that each par yield is the coupon rate at which a bond of that maturity would price at exactly 100, and that the spot rates used to discount single cash flows must be extracted from these par yields one maturity at a time. All rates are annual rates with annual compounding.

Exhibit 1. Government par yields (annual coupons, annual compounding)

1-year: 2.50%

2-year: 3.00%

3-year: 3.40%

4-year: 3.70%

Brandt is also asked to value a 3-year government bond with a 5% annual coupon, paid at the end of each year, using the spot rates he derives. Okafor adds that a two-year forward rate starting two years from now is often quoted on the desk when the team discusses where medium-term rates are priced to be in the future.

Finally, Okafor asks Brandt to think about returns. She says: "Suppose that over the next year, interest rates evolve exactly as the current forward rates imply. I want you to tell me what one-year holding period return we would earn on the 3-year 5% bond under that scenario, and how it compares with the bond's yield to maturity." Brandt notes that the bond's yield to maturity, computed from the price he derives, is 3.39%.

If rates evolve exactly as the current forward rates imply, the one-year holding period return on the 3-year 5% bond is closest to:

Next step

CFA Institute's Level II exam page

Questions people ask

Is Level II harder than Level I?

Each question asks more: every one sits on a vignette and the methods go deeper. The pass rate does not show this, because every Level II candidate has already passed Level I: CFA Institute's 10-year average is 45% at Level II against 40% at Level I.

How many hours should I study for Level II?

CFA Institute says successful candidates report studying on average over 300 hours for each level.

What is the hardest topic at Level II?

It depends on your background, which is why the free diagnostic scores you by topic. Financial Statement Analysis, Equities, Fixed Income, Portfolio Construction and Ethics each carry 10 to 15% of the exam, so a weak spot there costs the most.