Level III

How hard is Level III?

Level III is the only level where you write your own answers. Half of its 22 sets are essay sets, marked on what you write, and the rest are item sets of four multiple-choice questions. Over the last ten years 51% of Level III candidates passed.

Sets11 item sets and 11 essay sets, 12 points each
TimeTwo sessions of 2 hours 12 minutes
Penalty for a wrong answerNone
2027 windowsFebruary and August
10-year average pass rate51% (2017 to 2026)

What makes it hard

  • Written answers: essay sets ask you to calculate, recommend or justify in your own words, and CFA Institute marks only the number of responses each question asks for, in the order you give them.
  • Application: every set hangs off a vignette about a client, a fund or a firm, so you must pick out the facts that matter before you answer.
  • Pace: 22 sets in 264 minutes is 12 minutes a set, including the reading.
  • Weight: your pathway is 30 to 35% of the exam, so one specialism carries a third of your result.

What makes it easier

Every set is worth the same 12 points, so a set you know well is quick points. A correct number typed alone earns full credit on a calculation, so you do not need to write out working. There is no penalty for a wrong answer, so every question gets an answer.

How Level III compares with Levels I and II

Level ILevel IILevel III
10-year average pass rate (2017 to 2026)40%45%51%
Written answersNoNoYes, 11 essay sets

Try 4 questions

Question 1Overview of Equity Portfolio Management
Item set: Thornbury Hospital Foundation: equity mandate review

Priya Raman, CFA, is chief investment officer of the Thornbury Hospital Foundation. The foundation's equity allocation is $480 million, held today in a single global index fund. The investment committee has asked Raman to review how the equity allocation is structured, whether it can earn extra income, and how the foundation should act as a shareholder.

Raman first divides the equity allocation into three segments and records what the committee learned from a year of manager due diligence.

Exhibit 1. Equity segments under review

Domestic large-cap: 55% of equities; on average 22 analysts follow each company; the committee found no active manager whose net-of-fee record it trusts

Domestic small-cap: 15% of equities; on average 4 analysts follow each company; the committee found one manager whose process and net-of-fee record it trusts

Emerging markets: 30% of equities; on average 7 analysts follow each company; the committee found two managers whose processes and net-of-fee records it trusts

The committee's policy is to use active management only where it believes prices are less efficient and where it has found a manager it trusts.

Next, Raman plans to move the large-cap holdings into a separately managed index account held in the foundation's own name, so that the foundation keeps the voting rights on its shares. The custodian has offered a securities lending program for this account.

Exhibit 2. Securities lending proposal

Expected average market value of shares on loan: $72 million

Lending fee paid by borrowers: 0.40% a year of the value on loan

Split of lending fees: 75% to the foundation and 25% to the custodian

Collateral: government securities (non-cash), so there is no collateral reinvestment income

To raise more income for grants, Raman also considers writing one-month call options with a strike price 5% above the current price on part of the large-cap holdings, renewing them each month.

Finally, two board members debate shareholder engagement. Board member Linton argues that, because the foundation will index its large-cap holdings, it cannot sell the shares of companies it dislikes, and so engaging with company boards is pointless. Board member Osei notes that the foundation owns a small stake in each company and that any improvement it achieves would also benefit every other shareholder, including those who do nothing.

Under the committee's policy, which segment is most appropriate to manage passively?
Question 2Overview of Equity Portfolio Management
Item set: Thornbury Hospital Foundation: equity mandate review

Priya Raman, CFA, is chief investment officer of the Thornbury Hospital Foundation. The foundation's equity allocation is $480 million, held today in a single global index fund. The investment committee has asked Raman to review how the equity allocation is structured, whether it can earn extra income, and how the foundation should act as a shareholder.

Raman first divides the equity allocation into three segments and records what the committee learned from a year of manager due diligence.

Exhibit 1. Equity segments under review

Domestic large-cap: 55% of equities; on average 22 analysts follow each company; the committee found no active manager whose net-of-fee record it trusts

Domestic small-cap: 15% of equities; on average 4 analysts follow each company; the committee found one manager whose process and net-of-fee record it trusts

Emerging markets: 30% of equities; on average 7 analysts follow each company; the committee found two managers whose processes and net-of-fee records it trusts

The committee's policy is to use active management only where it believes prices are less efficient and where it has found a manager it trusts.

Next, Raman plans to move the large-cap holdings into a separately managed index account held in the foundation's own name, so that the foundation keeps the voting rights on its shares. The custodian has offered a securities lending program for this account.

Exhibit 2. Securities lending proposal

Expected average market value of shares on loan: $72 million

Lending fee paid by borrowers: 0.40% a year of the value on loan

Split of lending fees: 75% to the foundation and 25% to the custodian

Collateral: government securities (non-cash), so there is no collateral reinvestment income

To raise more income for grants, Raman also considers writing one-month call options with a strike price 5% above the current price on part of the large-cap holdings, renewing them each month.

Finally, two board members debate shareholder engagement. Board member Linton argues that, because the foundation will index its large-cap holdings, it cannot sell the shares of companies it dislikes, and so engaging with company boards is pointless. Board member Osei notes that the foundation owns a small stake in each company and that any improvement it achieves would also benefit every other shareholder, including those who do nothing.

The foundation's expected annual income from the securities lending program is closest to:
Question 3Overview of Equity Portfolio Management
Item set: Thornbury Hospital Foundation: equity mandate review

Priya Raman, CFA, is chief investment officer of the Thornbury Hospital Foundation. The foundation's equity allocation is $480 million, held today in a single global index fund. The investment committee has asked Raman to review how the equity allocation is structured, whether it can earn extra income, and how the foundation should act as a shareholder.

Raman first divides the equity allocation into three segments and records what the committee learned from a year of manager due diligence.

Exhibit 1. Equity segments under review

Domestic large-cap: 55% of equities; on average 22 analysts follow each company; the committee found no active manager whose net-of-fee record it trusts

Domestic small-cap: 15% of equities; on average 4 analysts follow each company; the committee found one manager whose process and net-of-fee record it trusts

Emerging markets: 30% of equities; on average 7 analysts follow each company; the committee found two managers whose processes and net-of-fee records it trusts

The committee's policy is to use active management only where it believes prices are less efficient and where it has found a manager it trusts.

Next, Raman plans to move the large-cap holdings into a separately managed index account held in the foundation's own name, so that the foundation keeps the voting rights on its shares. The custodian has offered a securities lending program for this account.

Exhibit 2. Securities lending proposal

Expected average market value of shares on loan: $72 million

Lending fee paid by borrowers: 0.40% a year of the value on loan

Split of lending fees: 75% to the foundation and 25% to the custodian

Collateral: government securities (non-cash), so there is no collateral reinvestment income

To raise more income for grants, Raman also considers writing one-month call options with a strike price 5% above the current price on part of the large-cap holdings, renewing them each month.

Finally, two board members debate shareholder engagement. Board member Linton argues that, because the foundation will index its large-cap holdings, it cannot sell the shares of companies it dislikes, and so engaging with company boards is pointless. Board member Osei notes that the foundation owns a small stake in each company and that any improvement it achieves would also benefit every other shareholder, including those who do nothing.

The call-writing program Raman is considering would most likely:
Question 4Overview of Equity Portfolio Management
Item set: Thornbury Hospital Foundation: equity mandate review

Priya Raman, CFA, is chief investment officer of the Thornbury Hospital Foundation. The foundation's equity allocation is $480 million, held today in a single global index fund. The investment committee has asked Raman to review how the equity allocation is structured, whether it can earn extra income, and how the foundation should act as a shareholder.

Raman first divides the equity allocation into three segments and records what the committee learned from a year of manager due diligence.

Exhibit 1. Equity segments under review

Domestic large-cap: 55% of equities; on average 22 analysts follow each company; the committee found no active manager whose net-of-fee record it trusts

Domestic small-cap: 15% of equities; on average 4 analysts follow each company; the committee found one manager whose process and net-of-fee record it trusts

Emerging markets: 30% of equities; on average 7 analysts follow each company; the committee found two managers whose processes and net-of-fee records it trusts

The committee's policy is to use active management only where it believes prices are less efficient and where it has found a manager it trusts.

Next, Raman plans to move the large-cap holdings into a separately managed index account held in the foundation's own name, so that the foundation keeps the voting rights on its shares. The custodian has offered a securities lending program for this account.

Exhibit 2. Securities lending proposal

Expected average market value of shares on loan: $72 million

Lending fee paid by borrowers: 0.40% a year of the value on loan

Split of lending fees: 75% to the foundation and 25% to the custodian

Collateral: government securities (non-cash), so there is no collateral reinvestment income

To raise more income for grants, Raman also considers writing one-month call options with a strike price 5% above the current price on part of the large-cap holdings, renewing them each month.

Finally, two board members debate shareholder engagement. Board member Linton argues that, because the foundation will index its large-cap holdings, it cannot sell the shares of companies it dislikes, and so engaging with company boards is pointless. Board member Osei notes that the foundation owns a small stake in each company and that any improvement it achieves would also benefit every other shareholder, including those who do nothing.

Which response to the board members' debate on engagement is most accurate?

Next step

CFA Institute's Level III exam page

Questions people ask

Is Level III harder than Level II?

It asks for a different skill: you write answers in half the sets. The pass rate does not show this, because every Level III candidate has already passed two levels. CFA Institute's 10-year averages are 51% at Level III, 45% at Level II and 40% at Level I.

How many hours should I study for Level III?

CFA Institute's Level III page says: "Successful candidates report studying on average over 300 hours for each level of the CFA Exam."

What is the hardest part of Level III?

For most candidates it is the essay sets, because the answer has to be written in the form the question asks for. Our essay lesson and every practice essay set come with a model answer and a marking guide to check yourself against.