Oxbridge Philosophy interview questions

Cambridge Philosophy interviews run between 7 and 18 December 2026. Oxford has no single-honours Philosophy: it is studied in joint courses such as PPE, Philosophy and Theology, and Physics and Philosophy, each with its own December dates. Expect a thought experiment and an argument you have to test. Four practice questions are below.

Philosophy interviews at Oxford and Cambridge

What mattersOxfordCambridge
CourseJoint courses only (PPE, Philosophy and Theology and others)Philosophy
Admissions testDepends on the joint course: PPE uses TARA, Physics and Philosophy ESAT, Maths and Philosophy TMUANone to register for. Jesus and Trinity set a college assessment
Written workPhilosophy and Theology: yes. PPE: noneDowning only (two pieces)
InterviewsOnline, by course: see the table below7 to 18 December 2026, online or in person by college
Applications per placeSee the acceptance rate pages belowAbout 5 (2025)

How Philosophy interviews run

Philosophy interviews usually give you a short argument or a thought experiment and ask what you think. The tutor then pushes back. What counts is how you handle the objection: refine your view, concede a point, or show why the objection fails.

Define your terms early. Many philosophy questions turn on what a word means, and saying so out loud shows you have seen it.

At Cambridge, Jesus interviews UK-based Philosophy applicants in person, and many other colleges interview online. At Oxford, check the dates for your joint course in the table below: they differ by course.

Philosophy interview questions to practise

Say your first thoughts out loud or type them, then compare with how a strong answer goes. These questions are our own, written in the style tutors use.

  1. Question 1

    A machine scans your body, destroys it, and builds an exact copy on Mars from new atoms. The copy has all your memories. Did you travel to Mars, or did you die?

    What it shows a tutor: Testing a theory of personal identity against a case, and following an argument where it leads.

    How a strong answer goes
    1. First pin down what would make the person on Mars me. Two candidates: the same body and brain, or the same memories and personality.
    2. On the body view, I died: none of my matter went to Mars.
    3. On the memory view, I survived, because the copy remembers being me and will go on as I would.
    4. Now push the memory view: suppose the machine fails to destroy the original. There are two people with my memories. They cannot both be me, as they will lead different lives. So memory alone seems not enough.
    5. That suggests either identity needs something extra, such as continuity of the brain, or, more radically, that identity is not what matters, and what I care about is that someone like me continues. I would tentatively take the second view and say why.

    A tutor might then ask: If you would not step into the machine, would you agree to have your brain cells replaced one at a time over a year?

    The usual wrong turn: Giving a gut answer and defending it. Show how a test case changes your view.

  2. Question 2

    Can you know that you are not dreaming right now?

    What it shows a tutor: Handling a classic sceptical argument without either dismissing it or giving up.

    How a strong answer goes
    1. The argument: dreams can feel exactly like waking life, so any test I use while awake could be dreamt too. So I cannot be certain I am awake.
    2. I might say dreams are less consistent. But in a dream I may not notice that, and I cannot step outside to compare.
    3. So if knowing requires certainty, perhaps I do not know I am awake. The question is whether knowledge needs certainty.
    4. In ordinary life, we say we know things on very good evidence that could in principle be wrong. On that standard, I know I am awake.
    5. So my answer depends on the definition of knowledge. The argument is a good reason to ask what knowledge is.

    A tutor might then ask: Is there anything you could know for certain even if you were dreaming?

    The usual wrong turn: Saying you would pinch yourself. You could dream the pinch.

  3. Question 3

    Is it wrong to break a promise to someone who has died?

    What it shows a tutor: Separating what makes promises matter and testing each reason on a case.

    How a strong answer goes
    1. Why do promises matter? Perhaps because breaking them harms the person, or because keeping them builds trust, or because we have bound ourselves.
    2. Harm: on one view, going back to Epicurus, the dead cannot be harmed because there is no one left to harm. Others argue that some interests, such as how we are remembered, survive death. If the first view is right, harm cannot be the reason.
    3. But many people feel there still is. That suggests harm is not the whole story. Breaking a deathbed promise also wrongs the person's wishes and shows something about the promiser's character.
    4. Trust matters too: if people knew deathbed promises were broken, the dying could not rely on anyone.
    5. So I would say it can be wrong, though perhaps less wrong, and that the case shows promising is not only about harm.

    A tutor might then ask: What if keeping the promise would harm someone who is alive?

    The usual wrong turn: Saying it is fine because they will never know, then ignoring why the answer feels wrong to most people.

  4. Question 4

    Is a law that is never enforced still a law?

    What it shows a tutor: Clarifying a concept and drawing distinctions, a skill shared by philosophy and law.

    How a strong answer goes
    1. One view: a law is a rule made by the right authority through the right process. On that view, it is a law until it is repealed, enforced or not.
    2. Another view: a law is what officials will actually do. On that view, a rule nobody enforces is a dead letter, not really law.
    3. A test case: an old law still on the books that nobody has used for a century. If a prosecutor suddenly used it, would a court accept it? Usually yes, which supports the first view.
    4. But there is something to the second: a law that people cannot predict being used undermines fairness, which is why some systems let laws lapse through disuse.
    5. So I would say it is still a law, but a defective one, and that shows validity and effectiveness are different properties.

    A tutor might then ask: Is a rule that is enforced, but was never properly made, a law?

    The usual wrong turn: Answering from one definition without noticing there are two.

Oxford interview dates, December 2026

All Oxford interviews are online. Your invitation gives your own times.

CourseTestWritten workInterviewsSecond college
Philosophy, Politics and EconomicsTARANone7 to 9 Dec 202611, 14, 15 or 16 Dec (told by 4pm, 10 Dec)
Philosophy and TheologyNoneBy 10 November7 to 10 Dec 20267 to 10 Dec, same window
Physics and PhilosophyESATNone9 to 15 Dec 2026None timetabled
Mathematics and PhilosophyTMUANone14 to 17 Dec 202616 to 17 Dec (told by 2pm, 16 Dec)
Computer Science and PhilosophyTMUANone14 to 17 Dec 202616 to 17 Dec (told by 2pm, 16 Dec)
Philosophy and Modern LanguagesNoneNone7 to 10 Dec 202614 to 16 Dec (told by 2pm, 11 Dec)
Psychology, Philosophy and LinguisticsTARANone14 to 16 Dec 2026None timetabled

What tutors are listening for

  • Thinking aloud

    Both universities say they want to hear how you work things out, not a memorised answer.

  • Using a hint

    Tutors expect to help. What matters is what you do with a prompt or an objection.

  • Checking

    Test your answer on a simple case, an example or a counterexample, and fix slips out loud.

Rehearse PPE problems out loud

The Oxbridge Interview Rehearsal's PPE problems train the same skills: think aloud, take a hint, answer the follow-up. One problem in each subject is free, with feedback on how your thinking comes across.

Free PPE problemSee plans

Oxbridge Interview Rehearsal: two subjects

£249 once. No VAT is charged.

Introductory price £249 until 31 December, then £399.

Rehearse every problem in two subjects you choose, with hints, follow-ups and Mia's marks, for 12 months.

  • All 8 problems in each of your two subjects, chosen after you pay
  • Hints when you are stuck, then the tutor's follow-up questions
  • Mia's marks on up to 60 attempts a day, within a fair-use allowance for each interview season: thinking aloud, using hints, checking, reasoning
  • Your next problem picked from your weakest skill
  • Your latest 300 attempts saved, with re-attempts side by side

Access for 12 months, until 6 November 2027. Choose your subjects after paying, on a free account. Full refund within 14 days, for any reason.

By paying you agree to our Terms and get access straight away, which ends your 14-day cancellation right. Your full refund within 14 days, for any reason, still applies.

Oxbridge Interview Rehearsal: all subjects

£349 once. No VAT is charged.

Introductory price £349 until 31 December, then £499.

Every problem in all seven subjects, for joint courses and for practising beyond your own subject.

  • All 56 problems: Maths, Computer Science, Engineering, Physics, Economics, Law and PPE
  • Hints when you are stuck, then the tutor's follow-up questions
  • Mia's marks on up to 60 attempts a day, within a fair-use allowance for each interview season: thinking aloud, using hints, checking, reasoning
  • Your next problem picked from your weakest skill
  • Your latest 300 attempts saved, with re-attempts side by side

Access for 12 months, until 6 November 2027. Use it on a free account. Full refund within 14 days, for any reason.

By paying you agree to our Terms and get access straight away, which ends your 14-day cancellation right. Your full refund within 14 days, for any reason, still applies.

More for your application

Questions people ask

Can I study Philosophy on its own at Oxford?

No. Oxford teaches Philosophy in joint courses, such as PPE, Philosophy and Theology, Physics and Philosophy, Maths and Philosophy, and Computer Science and Philosophy.

When are Cambridge Philosophy interviews?

Between 7 and 18 December 2026, online or in person by college. Jesus interviews UK-based Philosophy applicants in person.

Is there a Philosophy admissions test at Cambridge?

Nothing to register for. Jesus and Trinity set their own assessment for shortlisted applicants.

Do I need to have studied philosophy?

No. Tutors look at how you reason about an argument in front of you, not how many philosophers you can name.